Patent

Do I Really Need a Patent Agent?

By Abhijit Bhand August 25, 2025

Yes, you can file a patent application on your own in India. The more useful question is whether you should. Turning an evolving idea into claims that withstand examination, avoid Section 3 objections, and still cover future commercial variants is not routine paperwork. It is careful legal and technical drafting. A registered patent agent is trained to do precisely this.

Who is a patent agent, legally speaking?

Under the Patents Act, 1970, India formally recognizes registered patent agents. These are professionals with a science or engineering degree who have passed the Patent Agent Examination and whose names appear on the Indian Patent Office register. They are authorized to practice before the Controller, prepare and file documents, transact all business at the Patent Office, and sign or verify papers for applicants. Those aren’t my words; that’s straight from Chapter XXI of the Act: Sections 125 (the register), 126 (who qualifies), 127 (what they’re allowed to do), and 128 (how they sign and verify). If you’re not on that register, you’re not allowed to “practice as a patent agent”, and there are penalties for holding yourself out as one. That’s Section 129 and Section 123 talking.  

Advocates vs agents

Advocates (attorneys) are lawyers who appear in court. Some attorneys working in patents sector are also registered patent agents, although many are not. If a dispute reaches court, for example an infringement action or an interim injunction, representation must be by an advocate. The Delhi High Court’s IP Division and its Patent Suits Rules set the procedure for such cases and allow the Court to take assistance from technical advisors, which can include qualified patent agents. In practice, agents lead before the Patent Office. Advocates lead in court. Both roles are complementary.

What does a patent agent actually contribute?

Section 10 of the Act requires a complete specification to fully and particularly describe the invention, disclose the best method known to the applicant, and conclude with clear, succinct claims that are fairly based on the disclosure. Many self-drafted filings fail on these core requirements. If the description is thin, the claims lack support. If the claims track a single prototype too closely, competitors can make minor changes and avoid infringement. If claims are written broadly without technical grounding, enablement and clarity objections follow. An experienced agent balances breadth and support so the claims matter in the market and stand up at the Patent Office.

Want to file a patent? Contact Us!

Section 3 and the boundary problems

Section 3 excludes, among other things, mere admixtures, arrangements or re-arrangements of known devices, and computer programs per se. When an invention edges toward an exclusion, the specification must frame a concrete technical contribution and real-world effect. Agents understand how Controllers apply these boundaries in practice and draft accordingly. First-time filers often learn this the hard way when a First Examination Report arrives.

A simple illustration

An inventor files a provisional that mirrors a prototype of a pill reminder built with a 5 volt panel on a bamboo handle. Six months later, a competing product appears with a 6 volt panel on an aluminum frame. If the later complete specification preserves that narrow framing, the claim set will struggle to cover the competing product. A competent agent would have abstracted the inventive concept into claims around power harvesting, trigger logic, and the reminder assembly, and then used the prototype as one embodiment among several. That approach preserves commercial room for normal design changes.

Procedure and timelines that can make or break a case

The Patent Office enforces strict timelines for publication, request for examination, responses to First Examination Reports, and hearings. Missing a prescribed period can result in abandonment. When speed is important, India provides expedited examination under Rule 24C. Form 18A and suitable evidence can qualify a case for acceleration for categories such as recognized startups and small entities, certain international search or examination routes, women applicants, and notified government-linked categories. If a regular request under Rule 24B has already been filed, it can often be converted to expedited by paying the fee difference, provided the conversion is made within the permitted window. These levers influence time to grant and strengthen negotiating position with investors or partners.

Filing abroad and the national phase in India

PCT filings and national phase entries require claim strategies that align with Indian practice, particularly on Section 3. Translations must be accurate, and positions taken before the EPO or USPTO should be managed so they do not undermine prosecution in India. The Patent Office Manual explains how national phase timing interacts with examination and how expedited routes fit within the 31 month entry deadline. A patent agent coordinates these moving parts so the filing cadence matches product launches and funding milestones.

Confidentiality and privilege

Legal professional privilege in India derives from the Evidence Act. Communications with advocates are protected. Communications with non-lawyer patent agents are not automatically privileged to the same degree. For sensitive matters, many applicants route strategy discussions through an advocate while the agent handles specification drafting and prosecution. This protects privileged advice if a dispute later arises.

When matters go to court

If a case proceeds to court, the Delhi High Court’s IP Division Rules and the Patent Suits Rules provide a stable framework. Courts may appoint technical advisors, and experienced patent agents often assist with claim construction, file history summaries, and technical primers. Advocacy and litigation strategy remain the domain of the advocate. Well-documented prosecution by the agent supports efficient litigation later, which is why aligning both roles early is prudent.

Want to file a patent? Contact Us!

Compliance checks you should not skip

Only registered patent agents may practice as agents. Verify registration status on the Indian Patent Office’s electronic register. Rule 108 specifies the particulars the register must show, including name, nationality, principal place of business, registration date, and renewals. These quick checks prevent engagement with unqualified intermediaries and reduce risk.

DIY or hire: how to decide

Filing on your own is permitted and sometimes sensible for a placeholder provisional, especially for student teams that need a priority date before an academic presentation. The later complete specification must still meet Section 10 requirements and cannot add new matter without losing the early date. For applications expected to support commercialization, licensing, fund-raising, or foreign filings, professional drafting is the more reliable path. It reduces the number of office actions, shortens time to grant when paired with the correct examination route, and produces cleaner claims that withstand opposition or enforcement.

Cost, timing, and what value really means

Official fees are published and transparent. Professional fees vary by technology, complexity, and scope. Value should be measured by outcomes: fewer rounds of prosecution, improved prospects for expedited processing, and claim language that supports licensing and enforcement rather than merely recording a prototype. Avoid anyone who is not on the register. The Act penalizes unauthorized practice, and shortcuts at this stage can jeopardize the application.

Choosing the right agent

Confirm registration status. Check experience in the relevant technical domain. Ask about familiarity with expedited examination, PCT and national phase cleanup, and collaboration with litigation counsel for oppositions and enforcement. These indicators show whether the agent can carry the file from drafting through grant and support downstream needs if the patent becomes a contested asset.

Want to file a patent? Contact Us!

The bottom line

Filing pro se is lawful and sometimes useful for a quick provisional. For serious objectives, including commercialization, investment, publication planning, and cross-border protection, a registered patent agent materially improves the quality, scope, and speed of protection. The law gives flexibility in how to proceed. Experience shows that early involvement of the right professional gives an invention its best legal form and better odds of holding its ground when it matters


Abhijit Bhand

Abhijit Bhand

Abhijit is an Intellectual Property Consultant and Co-founder of the Kanadlab Institute of Intellectual Property & Research. As a Registered Indian Patent Agent (IN/PA-5945), he works closely with innovators, startups, universities, and businesses to protect and commercialise their inventions. He had also worked with the Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur as a Principal Research Scientist, where he handled intellectual property matters for the institute.

A double international master's degree holder in IP & Technology Law (JU, Poland), and IP & Development Policy (KDI School, S. Korea), and a Scholar of World Intellectual Property Organisation (Switzerland), Abhijit has engaged with stakeholders in 15+ countries and delivered over 300 invited talks, including at FICCI, ICAR, IITs, and TEDx. He is passionate about making patents a powerful tool for innovation and impact.

← Back to All Articles